Subscription pricing
One of the RC passages in Sept. 2009 was about copyright and tangible object theory (TOT). In general, the passage goes like this (working from memory here since it's not with me at the moment but it's been bothering me all day):
P1 - Intro of TOT and the VP of proponents - that copyright and other IP rights apply to tangible objects
P2 - extension of P1, with the intro of retained rights concept
P3 - says that TOT has chief advantage of justifying IP rights "without recourse to the popular but problematic assumption that ideas can be copyrighted" or something like that.
I was very confused by that statement in P3. It reads to me like TOT (which holds that tangible objects can be protected) is justifying IP rights while also NOT being COUNTER to the idea that intangible objects (like ideas) cannot be copyrighted (or protected under IP Law).
Am I going crazy? If someone is familiar with this passage, can you please help me out?
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-2-passage-3-passage/
0
8 comments
Bumping this to the top so someone can help you out.
Thank you!
@mcglazo260 said:
Ah! Ok - I got this test from TestMasters and their packet said September. Sorry about that @7sagestudentservices
No worries! I corrected your thread title so people can better help out. :)
(I'm not very LSAT-savvy otherwise I'd offer my help!)
Ah! Ok - I got this test from TestMasters and their packet said September. Sorry about that @7sagestudentservices
Hmm. I looked up your question and found PT58.S2.P3's RC, which is October 2009.
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-2-passage-3-passage/
@7sagestudentservices said:
September? Do you have the months mixed up?
No it's Sept 2009 :) (Sorry I didn't tag you in the earlier post)
Hey! No it's Sept. 2009.
September? Do you have the months mixed up?