Can someone translate "No H is not A" for me?

Is it H -> A? (I tried to understand the sentence, rather than using the conditional rules)

Can someone explain this in detail using the conditional rule?

0

3 comments

  • Tuesday, Sep 04 2018

    Thank you both! (3 @donamhyun690 @samanthaashley92715(/p)

    0
  • Monday, Sep 03 2018

    To echo @donamhyun690, "no" is negate necessary, and "not" is clearly a negation. So technically, you'd translate that into /A --> /H. The contrapositive of that is H --> A.

    If I think about the negations as "cancelling each other out", I'm prone to making errors. Idk why because it's simple, but I prefer to write out the translation with both negations first.

    1
  • Sunday, Sep 02 2018

    Your translation is correct. The double negatives cancel.

    Using Lawgic rules...

    Conditional Group: 2 (No) negate necessary

    Idea 1: H

    Idea 2: /A

    Translation: H->A or /A->/H

    2

Confirm action

Are you sure?