I came across this one over 6 months ago, and I'm not sure if I can accurately answer it even now. It just feels like a ridiculous jump to weaken the conclusion.
I just looked at that one and I think essentially if they pass it on to the next generation it wouldn't just be found buried in a tomb w a person who has passed away. I know it's a reach, but the rest don't work at all. I feel like w this question u have to eliminate the others 100% and then say this is the least bad answer
Thanks, Renuka! I'm hoping people can use this thread to commisserate.
I came across this one over 6 months ago, and I'm not sure if I can accurately answer it even now. It just feels like a ridiculous jump to weaken the conclusion.
I just looked at that one and I think essentially if they pass it on to the next generation it wouldn't just be found buried in a tomb w a person who has passed away. I know it's a reach, but the rest don't work at all. I feel like w this question u have to eliminate the others 100% and then say this is the least bad answer
I came across this one over 6 months ago, and I'm not sure if I can accurately answer it even now. It just feels like a ridiculous jump to weaken the conclusion.
Ah, yes. Nice one!
I'll go with another #19, from PT 63, Section 3:
"Professor: One cannot frame an accurate conception..."
One way of framing a "the most difficult" question is how much time it forces you to spend. This one is deceptively simple, but is difficult to move on from with any certainty. It's so abstract and yet contains such a cognitive leap that eliminating answers is difficult to do definitively. Is the argument cogent, is it flawed? It seems easy in retrospect, but the first time around it was a HUGE time sink for me!
I came across this one over 6 months ago, and I'm not sure if I can accurately answer it even now. It just feels like a ridiculous jump to weaken the conclusion.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
5 comments
@waghrenu699 said:
@dulciexue49 said:
LSAT 73, Logical Reasoning I, Q19
A carved flint object depicting a stylized human…
I came across this one over 6 months ago, and I'm not sure if I can accurately answer it even now. It just feels like a ridiculous jump to weaken the conclusion.
I just looked at that one and I think essentially if they pass it on to the next generation it wouldn't just be found buried in a tomb w a person who has passed away. I know it's a reach, but the rest don't work at all. I feel like w this question u have to eliminate the others 100% and then say this is the least bad answer
Thanks, Renuka! I'm hoping people can use this thread to commisserate.
@waghrenu699 Yeah I've reviewed the answer... I still hate it though lol.
@dulciexue49 said:
LSAT 73, Logical Reasoning I, Q19
A carved flint object depicting a stylized human…
I came across this one over 6 months ago, and I'm not sure if I can accurately answer it even now. It just feels like a ridiculous jump to weaken the conclusion.
I just looked at that one and I think essentially if they pass it on to the next generation it wouldn't just be found buried in a tomb w a person who has passed away. I know it's a reach, but the rest don't work at all. I feel like w this question u have to eliminate the others 100% and then say this is the least bad answer
@dulciexue49 said:
LSAT 73, Logical Reasoning I, Q19
A carved flint object depicting a stylized human…
I came across this one over 6 months ago, and I'm not sure if I can accurately answer it even now. It just feels like a ridiculous jump to weaken the conclusion.
Ah, yes. Nice one!
I'll go with another #19, from PT 63, Section 3:
"Professor: One cannot frame an accurate conception..."
One way of framing a "the most difficult" question is how much time it forces you to spend. This one is deceptively simple, but is difficult to move on from with any certainty. It's so abstract and yet contains such a cognitive leap that eliminating answers is difficult to do definitively. Is the argument cogent, is it flawed? It seems easy in retrospect, but the first time around it was a HUGE time sink for me!
LSAT 73, Logical Reasoning I, Q19
A carved flint object depicting a stylized human…
I came across this one over 6 months ago, and I'm not sure if I can accurately answer it even now. It just feels like a ridiculous jump to weaken the conclusion.