@cjones76927 Just make sure you are asking someone you are positive will give you a superb review.
This is really great advice and can't be emphasized enough. I go so far as to ask specifically for an excellent LOR or nothing and no hard feelings if the latter is the case. Also, for professors, remember that this is essentially a run of the mill part of their job and so they should be perfectly capable of being open and honest about the type of LOR they could write. If they seem at all unenthusiastic or it's like pulling teeth to get it done then run for the hills!
Just make sure you are asking someone you are positive will give you a superb review. I'd advise to offer an exit to whomever you are asking in the event that they are a little hesitant. If you feel that they are uncertain then find someone else. I just really mention this as I went to undergrad where TA's were the ones who graded and taught us in a smaller scale environment. So if you had a good grade in the class but never made a presence to a professor it may not work out.... I recently went to a UCLA Law info event and I was SHOCKED to hear some of the bad LOR's that they receive. Don't let that be you.
Yes, from what I have gathered, most people waive it. It's not a super huge deal, but it does signal to the schools that their was no influence involved and that the recommenders were free to be as open and honest as they pleased. It seems like this matters more to some schools than others, but in the end there is really no benefit to not waiving it other than getting some gratification from reading about (hopefully) how great and awesome you are. Since you shouldn't be requesting or supplying letters that say anything less, why would you need to read them? If you are a borderline candidate in any regard, put your curiosity in check and waive your right so you don't have anything that might push you over to the wrong side of the fence.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
4 comments
This is really great advice and can't be emphasized enough. I go so far as to ask specifically for an excellent LOR or nothing and no hard feelings if the latter is the case. Also, for professors, remember that this is essentially a run of the mill part of their job and so they should be perfectly capable of being open and honest about the type of LOR they could write. If they seem at all unenthusiastic or it's like pulling teeth to get it done then run for the hills!
Just make sure you are asking someone you are positive will give you a superb review. I'd advise to offer an exit to whomever you are asking in the event that they are a little hesitant. If you feel that they are uncertain then find someone else. I just really mention this as I went to undergrad where TA's were the ones who graded and taught us in a smaller scale environment. So if you had a good grade in the class but never made a presence to a professor it may not work out.... I recently went to a UCLA Law info event and I was SHOCKED to hear some of the bad LOR's that they receive. Don't let that be you.
Yes, waive. Most do.
Yes, from what I have gathered, most people waive it. It's not a super huge deal, but it does signal to the schools that their was no influence involved and that the recommenders were free to be as open and honest as they pleased. It seems like this matters more to some schools than others, but in the end there is really no benefit to not waiving it other than getting some gratification from reading about (hopefully) how great and awesome you are. Since you shouldn't be requesting or supplying letters that say anything less, why would you need to read them? If you are a borderline candidate in any regard, put your curiosity in check and waive your right so you don't have anything that might push you over to the wrong side of the fence.